Legal Opinion

Ceridian Corporation v. Allied Mutual Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 5, 2000No. 99-2815PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY,. Circuit Judge.

Ceridian Corporation (Ceridian) and SCSC Corporation (SCSC) entered into a settlement agreement which enabled Ceri-dian to file a garnishment action against Allied Mutual Insurance Company (Allied) and Tower Insurance Company (Tower), both of whom had insured SCSC. After the insurers were discharged by operation of the Minnesota garnishment statute, Ceri-dian moved to compel further disclosure from the garnishees and for relief in the event the court concluded that Allied and Tower had been discharged. The district court 1 denied the motions, see Ceridian Corp. v. SCSC…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Gollust v. MendellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Joan M. Canfield v. Van Atta Buick/gmc Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ceridian Corporation v. Scsc CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API