Nordstrom v. Eaton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, appellant creditor challenges the district court’s decisions (1) denying her motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint against respondent insurer after the insurer’s disclosure in response to a second garnishment summons and (2) granting respondent insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a declaratory-judgment action. Because appellant’s failure to timely move the district court for leave to file a supplemental complaint against insurer after disclosure by the insurer in response to a first garnish ment summons discharged insurer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Ceridian Corporation v. Scsc CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Corn Plus Cooperative v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006