Legal Opinion
Vannoy v. Ocsea Local 11
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 23, 1999No. 2:97-cv-00817PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Velma Vannoy brings this action alleging violations of her rights under the Age Discrimination In Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED.
I
Plaintiff was born on April 3, 1934. During the period relevant to this action, Plaintiff was 62 years of age. Plaintiff was employed as a staff employee at Defendant OSCEA Local AFSCME AFL-CIO Company (also referred to as “Union”), a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hillman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Loper v. Computer Network Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Rogers-Libert v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001