Selma Sash, Door & Blind Factory v. Stoddard
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the City Court of Selma, in Equity. Heard before the Hon. J. W. Mabry. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The appeal is prosecuted from a decree sustaining the demurrers interposed to the bill filed by the appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The appellant filed its bill to enforce a lien for materials furnished, and used in the construction of a dwelling house for Cora L. Stoddard. The *252substantial averments show that respondent Stoddard contracted with respondent Norris for the erection and completion by the latter of a dwelling house for the former,’ for the express sum of $2,348, the completion of the building by the said Norris, according to contract, and the payment to him by the said Stoddard of all the money agreed to be paid,, except a balance of seventy-two dollars. The bill avers that complainant furnished to Norris…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John Spry Lumber Co. v. Sault Savings Bank Loan & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Laird v. MoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Randolph v. Builders & Painters Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Copeland v. Kehoe & RamseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Eufaula Water Co. v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Le Grand v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Richardson Lumber Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Leahart v. DeedmeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Becker Roofing Co. v. WysingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- First Colored Cumberland Presbyterian Church v. W. D. Wood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.