DeLamar v. Fidelity Loan & Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
TJpon rescission of a contract, the rescinding party must restore or offer to restore to the other party whatever he has received by virtue of the contract. This is the rule in cases both of rescission for fraud and of rescission by one party without the consent of the opposite party for non-performance by him of his covenants. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4305, 4306. “Destitution before absolution is as sound in law as in theology.” Summerall v. Graham, 62 Ga. 729. So, when the defendant rescinded the subscription- contract between it and the plaintiff, it should…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Hicks v. BeachamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Burkhalter v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tybrisa Co. v. Tybeeland, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Mendel v. PinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Prothro v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Manning v. WillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Alexis Inc. v. WerbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.