Legal Opinion
In re the Estate Croker
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 14, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The motion to dismiss the petition is granted, with costs. The decedent, Frank Croker, died in 1905. He was the son of Richard Croker, Sr. It was claimed that there was a complete accounting between the decedent’s administrator, Richard Croker, Jr., and his father, Richard Croker, Sr. Mrs. Bula Croker, the widow of Richard Croker, Sr., now seeks to compel an accounting. She appears in her individual capacity as a legatee under her husband’s, Richard Croker, Sr.’s, will or wills. She is not a person interested in the estate within the meaning of section 259 of the Surrogate’s Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hart v. GoadbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Bushe v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- In re the Estate of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re Redfield's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Bushe v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of KernNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Accounting of FriedmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- In re the Accounting of CambeisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969