Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Kern
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 28, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The application to vacate the decree dated June 10, 1935, judicially settling the account of the executors and trustees is denied. In accordance with the arrangement of the attorneys for the parties upon the hearing of this application there was submitted to the surrogate the preliminary question as to the effect and validity of certain instruments signed by the petitioners during the course of the administration of the estate. The petitioners contend that these instruments, wherein they consented to the retention of securities left by the decedent and to the investment of the estate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matter of WentworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In Re the Accounting of the Empire Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Woodbridge v. . BockesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Delafield v. BarretNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of SaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Estate of JanesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1995
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Brooklyn Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Estate of RiegelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of WildenburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.