Legal Opinion

In re Lloyd

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1949No. 5454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaeRett, Chief Judge

We have here an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of seven claims, being all the claims, of appellant’s application for patent entitled “For Heat-Insulating Material.” The claims are numbered respectively 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18.

In the brief for appellant it is stated:

The problem that confronted appellant was to provide an integral insulation material having, among others, the following physical characteristics:(1) An insulation temperature range up to and in excess of 1,000° F.(2) Light…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In re FullamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. In re LewensteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. In re OsseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of DaltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of Alexander WeberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of DaltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API