Legal Opinion

Ross v. Grand Pants Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 21, 1912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Eon. James E. Goodrich, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, C.

— This court . is without jurisdiction of this case unless the construction of the *297Constitution of the State is involved. On the part of appellant it is asserted the provision of our Constitution relating to trial by jury was drawn in question in the trial court in this wise: At the close of the evidence in the case the court adjourned until the following morning, and upon its reconvening appellant’s counsel stated that after adjourment on the previous day he had learned one of the twelve jurors had not been sworn to try the case, wherefore counsel moved the court “to discharge the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardenburgh v. CraryNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Ward v. QuinlivinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Klotz v. PerteetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. State v. EarllSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Sheffield Ice Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. Jefferson County v. Berkshire Development Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Tyon v. Wabash Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Badger v. BadgerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Ross v. Grand Pants Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API