Legal Opinion

State v. Earll

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 12, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — 1Ion. Ralph 8. Latshaw, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

At the April term, 1909, of the criminal court of Jackson county, the prosecuting attorney of said county filed an information charging “that C. W. Earll, whose Christian name in full is unknown to said prosecuting attorney, late of the county aforesaid, on the 17th day of May, 1909, at the county of Jackson, State of Missouri, did then and there unlawfully and knowingly sell, and offer for salé, exchange and deliver, a certain quantity of vinegar, to-wit, one pint of vinegar artificially colored with caromel or other artificial coloring matter, contrary to the statutes in such cases made and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Barton Bros. v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ConwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Ross v. Grand Pants Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. State v. GlasscockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. State v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API