Wolfer v. Hurst
Oregon Supreme Court
From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. Action by Geo. J. Wolfer against W. S. Hurst and H. A. Hinkle to recover possession of real property. A motion to dismiss the appeal was'overruled pursuant to an opinion by Mr. Justice Moore, and the judgment appealed from was afterward affirmed, the opinion being written by Mr. Chief Justice Wolverton. The facts appear in the opinions.
1Opinion of the Court 1
Decided 10 April, 1905.
ON Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
2Opinion of the Court · MooreJustice Moore
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. An action of forcible entry and detainer was commenced in a justice’s court of Marion County, to recover the possession of about 80 acres of land, and, the cause being at issue, was tried, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff as demanded in the complaint; and defendants appealed to the circuit court for that county, giving an undertaking therefor, and also an undertaking for the payment to plaintiff of twice the rental value of the premises from the rendition of the judgment until final determination of…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Harrington v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1883
- Smith v. ReederOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Aiken v. AikenOregon Supreme Court · 1885
- Rosenblat v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Basche v. PringleOregon Supreme Court · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Northwestern Wisconsin Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Board of Education v. AstlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Nenzel v. Rochester Silver CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1927
- Wolfer v. HurstOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Decosta v. EbbessenSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.