Asbury v. Hecla Mining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Carey, J., entered December 18, 1917, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee in a mine.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— Plaintiff’s action is to recover for personal injuries received on October 30, 1916, while driving a mule train consisting of seven cars carrying about two tons of ore each, along and upon an eigbteen-incb gauge railway track, in an approximately one-mile tunnel belonging to the defendant’s mine in Idaho. Plaintiff’s duty was to stand on a small plat*543form on' the front car of the train and drive the mnle. The speed of the train was about eight miles per hour. While in the tunnel and at a curve, he discovered a timber truck about fifteen to twenty feet ahead of him on the track. He jumped…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. KneirimIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. LeachIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Union Pacific Railroad v. EricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Relyea v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoof v. Pacific American FisheriesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1922