Hoof v. Pacific American Fisheries
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The libelant was employed by the respondent in the capacity of watchman- on the vessel Cleo. The vessel had been launched, and was afloat in the navigable waters, but was not “finished,” and therefore not in commission, at the time, as an instrumentality of commerce and navigation. Plaintiff, while making his rounds, and in attempting to go from the forward bridge deck to the forward main deck by means of steps which had been constructed and placed there by the respondent, and for that purpose, slipped and fell to the floor of the main deck, throwing the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Thames Towboat Co. v. the Schooner "Francis McDonald"Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Sea LarkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- Edward S. Mesle v. Kea Steamship Corporation, (Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Gonzales v. United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
- McGhee v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- The President CoolidgeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.