Legal Opinion

Ian Michael Stead Belinda A. Stead v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 12, 2005No. 04-35028PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the taxpayer or the government bears the risk of loss when funds on deposit at a bank for practical purposes disappear after being levied upon by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and removed from a taxpayer’s bank account. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1346(a)(1), and we hold that, in light of the burden of proof on the taxpayer in a tax refund case, the risk of loss necessarily falls upon the taxpayer.

I

In tax year 1994, Plaintiff-Appellant Ian Michael Stead and his former wife, Lynan K. Stead, filed a federal income tax…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zapara v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  2. In Re HernandezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2012
  3. Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  4. Zapara v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Larosa's Intern. Fuel Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API