Ian Michael Stead Belinda A. Stead v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the taxpayer or the government bears the risk of loss when funds on deposit at a bank for practical purposes disappear after being levied upon by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and removed from a taxpayer’s bank account. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1346(a)(1), and we hold that, in light of the burden of proof on the taxpayer in a tax refund case, the risk of loss necessarily falls upon the taxpayer.
I
In tax year 1994, Plaintiff-Appellant Ian Michael Stead and his former wife, Lynan K. Stead, filed a federal income tax…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zapara v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- In Re HernandezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Zapara v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Larosa's Intern. Fuel Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.