Zapara v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question, inter alia, of whether the Tax Court had jurisdiction in a hearing conducted pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6330 to review the Internal Revenue Service’s failure to comply with its statutory mandate under 26 U.S.C. § 6335(f). We conclude that it did, and we affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.
I
Michael and Gina Zapara owe the IRS over $450,000 for failing to report income derived from a fraudulent check-cashing scheme. To recover these funds, the IRS issued a levy on accounts the Zaparas opened with a securities investment company, into…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Commissioner v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanwyck v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Craig Douglas Hoglund & Christine Joan Hoglund v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
- Fielder v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Hall v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Mattson v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.