Legal Opinion
Rothlein v. Armour and Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 66-362PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
This is an action filed under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S. C. § 185(a) for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing employees. The plaintiffs are individuals who are representa-, tive of a class of plaintiffs who are or were employed by the defendant at various times between 1926 and 1960. There are approximately eighty-two individuals in the class. The plaintiffs were and are members of the General Teamsters Union, Local 249. In 1952 the defendant Armour and Company created a pension plan as a result of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Local 783, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Aflcio v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Lucas v. Seagrave CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
- Robert Fraser, Jr. v. Magic Chef-Food Giant Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Joseph K. Knoll v. Phoenix Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Charlie Craig v. Bemis Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Shaw v. KruidenierDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1979
- Wishner v. St. Luke's Hospital CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.