New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Vizvari
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Joseph Vizvari against the New York, New Haven.& Hartford Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. This action is brought by an alien, a subject of the Emperor of Austria, against the defendant corporation, a citizen of the state of Connecticut, engaged in interstate commerce and doing business in the state of New York.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Joseph Vizvari against the New York, New Haven.& Hartford Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. This action is brought by an alien, a subject of the Emperor of Austria, against the defendant corporation, a citizen of the state of Connecticut, engaged in interstate commerce and doing business in the state of New York. At the time of the commencement of the action the plaintiff was a resident of the state of New York. The action is to recover damages for an injury…
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This cause comes here on writ of error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York to review a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff below for the sum of $5,626.61. The judgment is based upon the verdict of a jury in the amount of $5,500 with interest thereon from the 7th day Of November, 1912, to the date of the judgment, together with the costs. This judgment was awarded to the plaintiff below for injuries received by him while in the employ of the defendant below while working for it in repairs upon its tracks…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. MarlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Hallstein v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Southern Railway Co. v. WessingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Ferretti v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.