Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.
Plaintiffs seek Supreme Court review and, thereby, our reconsideration of our decision reversing the trial court’s peremptory writ of mandamus and remanding with instructions to dismiss the action. 117 Or App 385, 844 P2d 251 (1992). We now conclude that the reasoning in our opinion was erroneous, but that the result was correct for alternative reasons. We therefore allow reconsideration, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified.
Plaintiffs applied to the county for a comprehensive plan map amendment and a zone change for certain property. The county failed to take final action on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Bigej Enterprises v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Edney v. Columbia County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Fraley v. Deschutes County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State ex rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Edney v. COLUMBIA COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.