Pacific Legal Foundation v. Goyan
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentMurnaghan, Circuit Judge
As to standing, I am in full agreement with the majority. My dissent concerns the conclusion that the FDA lacks power to reimburse those whose participation in agency proceedings can reasonably be expected to contribute to a full and fair determination of the issue, but who, without reimbursement of their expenses, would be unable to participate effectively.
The authority of the FDA to hold hearings is clear. See, e. g., 21 U.S.C. §§ 344(b), 348(f), 355(c)-(e), 360b(d)-(e), 360e(g), 371(e). The authority to compel attendance to testify and otherwise to develop a record is also clear. 5 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bevan v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.