Legal Opinion

1537 Associates v. Kaprielian Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered July 1, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ affirmative defenses and counterclaims *448to the extent of dismissing the affirmative defense and counterclaim alleging fraud in the inducement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

While the general merger clause in the lease is ineffective to exclude the parol evidence of fraud in the inducement (see, Danann Realty Corp. v Harris, 5 NY2d 317, 320; Blittner v Filroben Assocs., 183 AD2d 645), we nonetheless find that the motion court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Ramos v. Madison Square Garden Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Blittner v. Filroben AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joseph v. NRT Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Joseph v. NRT Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2007
  3. New York City Educational Construction Fund v. Verizon New York Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. New York City Educational Construction Fund v. Verizon New York Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API