Legal Opinion
Joseph v. NRT Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 9, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Cynthia Kern, J.
Plaintiffs commenced the present action against defendants asserting claims for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Defendants NRT Incorporated, NRT New York, Inc. doing business as the Corcoran Group, the Corcoran Group Eastside, Inc. doing business as the Corcoran Group, Inc., Elizabeth Spahr and Dorothy Zeidman (the NRT defendants) move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them. For the reasons set forth below, the NRT defendants’ motion is granted.
The relevant facts are as follows. In 2005, plaintiffs purchased what they believed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- DiFilippo v. Hidden Ponds AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Hausler v. Spectra Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Berger-Vespa v. Rondack Building Inspectors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- 23 Realty Associates v. TeigmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.