Legal Opinion

Sangamon Coal Mining Co. v. Richardson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Hollín S. Williamson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGarnett, P. J.

Judgment having been rendered in favor of Charles W. Merriam, Isaac S. Collins and George W. Dexter against the Sangamon Coal Mining Company, upon which an execution was duly issued and returned unsatisfied, this proceeding in garnishment under Chap. 62 E. S., was commenced in the name of the company for the use of the judgment creditors, against the appellees. The purpose of the garnishment is to recover from appellees certain liabilities which are alleged to be due from them on shares of stock which they own -in said company. Appellees do not deny that they are the holders of the shares of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Webster v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Richardson v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Netter v. Board of TradeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thayer v. El Plomo Mining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  2. Chatroop v. BorgardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  3. Pullman v. Railway Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  4. Lorenson v. RuskAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Gasch v. World's Fair Excursion & Transportation Boat Co. ex rel. FehrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API