Legal Opinion

Webster v. Steele

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

While our statute in regard to garnishment, under which this proceeding was commenced in the court below, is comprehensive in its provisions, we do not think equitable claims can be subjected to this process. The terms employed are, “ indebted,” or “ hath any effects or estate ” in his custody or charge, enumerating “ lands, tenements, goods, chattels, moneys, choses in action, credits and effects.” The “ effects or estate,” spoken of, in the charge or custody of the garnishee, must belong to the defendant in attachment, or judgment debtor, and the choses in action or credits must be due or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stahl v. WebsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Hassie v. God is with Us CongregationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Hodson v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Harrell v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Commercial National Bank v. KirkwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. SchueckIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Roth v. KaptowskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Peters v. Snavely-AshtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API