Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Pataki

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 14, 2013No. Docket 10-2563PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACK, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether the civil commitment of the plaintiffs following the expiration of their sentences for sexually based criminal offenses constituted violations of their procedural due process rights redressable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and, if so, whether the defendants are nonetheless entitled on the record before the district court to summary judgment dismissing the procedural due process claims on the grounds of qualified immunity.

The plaintiffs’ commitments were effected not through the state’s normal civil commitment procedures, but by means of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. Estate of Marvin L. Booker v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Royal Crown Day Care LLC v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Naumovski v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Daily Services, LLC v. Tracy ValentinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API