Legal Opinion
State v. King
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 30, 2007No. 2006-418PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, j.
The defendant, Daniel King, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) denying his motion to suppress the victim’s in-court identifications. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. Between 7:00 and 7:30 p.m. on October 11,2003, fifteen-year-old K.C. was working at the Dunkin’ Donuts drive-through window on Loudon Road in Concord. A man ordered a large coffee. When K.C. approached the window, she noticed that the man’s genitals were exposed. K.C. turned around to put money in the register and turned back towards the man to give him his coffee. She again noticed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- United States v. Michael Lee Matthews and Robert G. PraterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gary Stephen DominaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- United States v. De León-QuiñonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.