Byrd v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The defendant-appellant, Calvin Byrd (“Byrd”), appeals from final judgments of conviction in the Superior Court for Burglary in the Second Degree, Theft, Conspiracy in the Second Degree, Resisting Arrest and Criminal Mischief. In this direct appeal, Byrd argues that the trial judge violated his due process rights under the United States Constitution by allowing an impermissibly suggestive in-court identification of him by a police officer. We have concluded that argument is without merit.
Facts
On November 20, 2009 the New Castle County Police received a tip about suspicious…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Gary Stephen DominaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Russell E. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Galloway v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- United States v. Shepard-FraserCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. ThurberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.