Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Holdridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1889No. 13,695PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the White Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

This cause was decided in the circuit court upon an agreed statement of facts. The material facts, a& agreed upon, are, that, on the 8th day of July, 1886, the appellee purchased from the ticket agent of the appellant a round-trip ticket from the town of Walcott to the town of Monticello and return, said towns being regular stations on the appellant’s road. Said ticket had printed on one end thereof, commencing in the middle of the paper on which they were printed, and extending down to one end, these words: “ Chicago, St. L. & Pitts. R. R. Co. Walcott, Ind., to Monticello, Ind. Good for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taber v. HutsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. FixIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Jeffersonville Railroad v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. MyrtleIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. BrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Willson v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WolfeIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. YountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Lucas v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API