Legal Opinion
Lemberger v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided May 29, 2020No. 8:18-cv-00064Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DANIEL LEMBERGER, Plaintiff, 8:18CV64 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“U.P.”) motions to exclude expert testimony under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms.,
509 U.S. 579, 589
(1993), Filing Nos. 39 and 40, and for summary judgment, Filing No. 41, after oral argument on the motions on May 13, 2020. This is an action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (“FELA”),
45 U.S.C. § 51
et seq. The plaintiff, Daniel Lemberger,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.