Legal Opinion · Dissent

Day's Case

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1DissentClark, J.

This action was brought under a special act of 15 February, 1899, to assert the right claimed by plaintiffs by virtue of the act of 26 January, 1899, abolishing the office of superintendent of the penitentiary and transferring to them the custody, the property and management of the institution from the defendant, who had been appointed superintendent by the Governor.

The defendant resists the demands of plaintiffs, averring that the act of 26 January, 1899, set out in the complaint, is unconstitutional (363) and void, in that its object is to deprive him of his office of superintendent of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bolton v. . AlbertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  3. Warner v. People ex rel. ConnerNew York Supreme Court · 1845
  4. C. C. Clark and Others v. . E. R. Stanley and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  5. State Ex Rel. Ewart v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State ex rel. McCrory v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. North Carolina Corp. CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1900
  4. Ward v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. State ex inf. Danforth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API