Fry v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
These appeals are from convictions for aggravated robbery. These appellants were tried together and each was assessed as punishment confinement for seven years.
The appellants do not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In their sole ground of error they contend that certain evidence admitted at their trial was the product of an illegal search and seizure. We agree.
The appellants were among four persons accused of committing an aggravated robbery of the complainant, Robert Herdman, on March 25,1978, in Dallas. Herdman was reported missing during the early morning…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Myre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Honeycutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Fearance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Dejarnette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.