Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
McCORMICK, Judge.
On original submission, a panel of this Court affirmed appellant’s conviction upon the basis of Haney v. State, 588 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), and Ferguson v. State, 571 S.W.2d 908 (Tex.Cr.App.1978). Appellant’s motion for leave to file motion for rehearing was granted in order for the Court to determine whether appellant’s judicial confession waived his right to appeal the unfavorable ruling upon his written pretrial motions to suppress. See Article 44.02, V.A.C.C.P. In the interim, Haney and Ferguson have been overruled to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dinnery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Massey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Dyar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- McKenna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Rosalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.