Legal Opinion

A. E. Fullenwider & Co. v. Longmoor

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1889No. 6317PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from'Milam. Tried below before Hon. W. E. Collard.

1Opinion of the Court

Henry, Associate Justice.—

Appellants were plaintiffs in the District Court, and alleged in their petition that appellees contracted with Hale & Hewett to furnish all the material and labor and construct a residence for appellees.

The contract was properly acknowledged by the husband and wife and recorded, and was made part of plaintiffs’ petition. It shows that Hale & Hewett were to receive for the entire job thirteen hundred dollars, and that one thousand dollars of the sum was paid when the contract was made by the execution and delivery to them of the negotiable promissory note of…

2Cited by40 opinions

  1. Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bullard v. NortonTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  3. First National Bank v. Lyon-Gray Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Crockett v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Wilson v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API