Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 27, 2012No. Misc. No. 2009-0564PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter was assigned to me for all purposes. Pending before me now is the Petition of the Federal Trade Commission for an Order Enforcing a Subpoena Duces Tecum [# 1]. 1 The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) seeks an order from this Court declaring that the documents requested in its subpoena duces tecum are not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine, as claimed by respondents, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BIPI”), and requiring the respondent to turn over the documents…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Yeda Research & Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH & Co. KGCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim, Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.