Miller v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The policy issue presented by this case is whether Wyoming is to adopt the unilateral theory or the bilateral theory of the crime of conspiracy. James Dean Miller (Miller) contends that regardless of the resolution of the policy question he was entitled to have the jury at his trial for conspiracy to commit the crime of kidnaping, in violation of WYO. STAT. §§ 6-l-303(a) and 6-2-201(a) (1988), instructed on the bilateral theory of conspiracy. He argues that, since the bilateral theory was given to the jury in his first trial, the bilateral theory became the law of the case,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- The United States of America v. Eddie BarboaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Armstrong v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ConwayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Metzger v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Reyna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. VecellioColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Janpol v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.