In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Dornay
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 In this case, we consider whether an attorney who admittedly gave false testimony in a court proceeding should be suspended or disbarred. Disbarment *675is the American Bar Association’s (ABA) presumptive sanction for attorneys who give false testimony in a court proceeding under the ABA’s Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (1991 & Supp. 1992) (ABA Standards). The focus of this case centers on the appropriate sanction after weighing the aggravators against the mitigators in light of sanctions imposed in similar cases.
C. Johnson, J.
*675¶2 Margita A. Dornay was charged by the Washington State…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HuddlestonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against TrejoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TrejoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HarvillWashington Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.