Legal Opinion

Baillon v. Carl Bolander & Sons Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1975No. 44941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This an action for treble damages arising out of the destruction of standing trees on urban real estate by a highway contractor in the course of building a freeway. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and plaintiffs were awarded the sum of $500 in actual damages. Two issues are raised by plaintiffs on appeal from the judgment. First, that the measure of damages should be the replacement cost of the trees and not, as the trial court held, the diminution in value of the real estate. As to that issue, we affirm. Second, that plaintiffs were entitled to treble damages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rector of St. Christopher's Episcopal Church v. C. S. McCrossan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Hueston v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Lawrenz v. Langford Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Reynolds v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rector of St. Christopher's Episcopal Church v. C. S. McCrossan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Vaught v. A.O. Hardee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Keitges v. VanDermeulenNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wyatt v. SweitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Farny v. Bestfield Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API