Legal Opinion

Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 29, 2008No. Case SACV 05-467 JVS(RNBx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Granting Motion for Return of '686 Sunset Royalties

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) seeks the return of royalties it paid to Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) on U.S. Patent No. 6,847,686 (“the '686 patent”) pursuant to an injunction that has since been reversed as to the '686 patent. Broadcom opposes the motion. The motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

Broadcom and Qualcomm compete in the chipset market for cell phones and other mobile radio devices. On May 29, 2007, a jury found that Qualcomm had directly infringed and induced…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PSM Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  2. Steele v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API