Legal Opinion

Holm v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1930No. 22555. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The cause was tried to the court and jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand dollars. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative for a new trial, both of which were overruled, and judgment was entered upon the verdict. From this judgment defendant appeals.

The facts essential to be stated are these: The appellant owns and operates a double-track street railway system. The different routes through the city bear designated names. Upon this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gannaway v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Heva v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Steinburg v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Rosenberg v. RosenblumWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Wullbrandt v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API