Legal Opinion
Bank of United States v. Braveman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The parties herein have submitted for determination, pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act, a question in difference arising upon facts stated in substance as follows:
The plaintiff, a domestic banking corporation, was taken over for the purpose of liquidation by the Superintendent of Banks on December 11, 1930, pursuant to the provisions of article II, section 57, of the Banking Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 2), being chapter 369 of the Laws of 1914, as amended. Prior to that date, defendant had indorsed and transferred to the bank for value before maturity a note made by Isidor…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Gerseta Corporation v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bohlinger v. ZangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In Re the Arbitration Between Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. & HolzNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Pink v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Bohlinger v. Ward & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.