Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hogan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1994No. F-88-918Published

1DissentChapel, Judge

I find that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of Manslaughter in the First Degree. For that reason, Hogan’s Judgment and Sentence should be reversed and remanded for a new trial. In addition, I find that the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce evidence of unadjudicated offenses during the second stage of trial to prove the aggravating circumstance of continuing threat. For these reasons, I dissent.

At trial, Hogan requested the jury be instructed on the lesser-included offense of Manslaughter in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. BartholomewWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Paxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Tarter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API