Legal Opinion

Ullmann v. Kent

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the lion. E. S. WilliaMS, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

We have fully considered this case, and have arrived at the conclusion that no notice to the vendee ivas necessary, of the re-sale of the goods.

We shall first dispose of a preliminary question :

The first count of the declaration is, that the plaintiffs agreed to sell to the defendant the hair and bristles of all hogs to be killed during the season, the defendant to remove the same and pay for them upon removal, at twelve cents per hog; that the plaintiffs killed a certain number of hogs, and were ready and willing that the defendant might enter on the premises and remove the hair and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollen v. . Le RoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Sands & Crump v. Taylor & LovettNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Chamber of Commerce v. SollittIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Woodworth v. FullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Plumb v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. E. B. Waples & Co. v. H. C. Overaker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ridgley v. MooneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Ingram v. WackernagelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API