Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Wackernagel
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 28, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Taylor District Court. — Hon. B. C. Henry, Judge. Action on an agreement for the purchase of cattle. There was a trial by jury-, and a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The agreement in suit is contained in two instruments in writing, of which the following are copies:
“I have this day bought of A. Ingram two hundred and eighty-two cattle, at five dollars and twenty-five cents per [hundredweight gross, to be delivered as .follows: Two loads now, and two loads in two weeks, one hundred more in October next, the remainder by the twenty-fifth of November. Said cattle to be yarded at Ingram’s scales twelve hours at night. Paid on the above, five hundred dollars.
“Mt. Ayb, Iowa, September 26, 1888.
“Cabl Wackebnagel.”
“I, A. Ingram, this day sold to O. Wackernagel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
- Sands v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- Bagley v. FindlayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Lewis v. . GreiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spaulding v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Maasdam v. Jefferson County Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Leeper v. SchroederColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- C. L. Percival Co. v. SeaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Growers' Exchange v. John A. Eck Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.