Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Midamco
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 20, 2009No. Case 1:07 CV 3164PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONALD C. NUGENT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF # 86). Plaintiff, Bonnie Kramer, filed a Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion (ECF # 103), and Defendant, Midamco, Inc., (“Midamco”) filed a reply in support of its motion. (ECF # 106). After careful consideration of the briefs and a review of all relevant authority, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1
The Complaint, filed on October 15, 2007, alleges that Bonnie Kramer, a member of the non-profit…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. Macy's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Fiedler v. OCEAN PROPERTIES, LTD.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Cohan v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Neal v. Morales Real Estate Investments, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019