Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Fire and Police Pension Ass'n

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1986No. 85CA1000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Patricia Peterson and Constance Preble, appeal the judgment of the *83trial court dismissing their action against the Fire and Police Pension Association (Association), the Police Pension and Relief Board (Board), Mike Licht as Auditor of the City and County of Denver, and the City and County of Denver, in which they sought a declaratory judgment that, they are entitled to survivors’ benefits not only under § 31-30-1001, et seq., C.R.S. (1985 Cum.Supp.) (State Plan) but also under the Denver City Charter. Alternatively, they sought a declaration that the State Plan is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abdullah Dohaish v. Dale TooleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Beacom Ex Rel. Seventeenth Judicial District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Police Pension & Relief Board v. McPhailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Community Tele-Communications, Inc. v. Heather Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Police Pension & Relief Board v. BillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Fire & Police Pension Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. City of Aurora v. AckmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API