Legal Opinion

Palomar Refining Co. v. Prentice

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1941No. Civ. 2673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within sixty days after the entry of the order appealed from.

The action was one to recover $361.02 for merchandise sold and delivered. The appellant moved for a change of venue to Los Angeles County on the ground that he resided there and that the goods had been delivered pursuant to a contract, “the greater portion of which” was to be performed in that county. On October 31, 1940, the court entered its order denying this motion. Apparently, a default judgment was thereafter entered against the appellant as the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Schainman v. KierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kocher v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Smith v. HalsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Gold Star Resorts, Inc. v. FuturewiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API