Scott v. Kay
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice.
The defendant below asks us to reverse a ruling of the Superior Court which denied his application to dismiss, or alternatively to stay, the action below. The suit was brought upon four promissory notes signed by appellant and three other individuals. All obligors were joined as defendants but service was made only upon appellant, the other three defendants being non-residents of Delaware. For the present purposes, counsel agree that the notes created a joint, and not a several, obligation.
Appellant’s theory is that the suit cannot be prosecuted against him alone and must…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wagner v. ShanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
- duPont v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- Carlisle v. Delaware Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Hessler, Inc. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- American Insurance Company v. Synvar CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parvin v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Silliman v. DuPontSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Harry David Zutz Insurance Inc. v. H. M. S. Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
- Hibou, Inc. v. RamsingSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- Wolhar v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.