Legal Opinion
Hibou, Inc. v. Ramsing
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided August 1, 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALSH, Judge.
The plaintiff, Hibou, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, instituted this action by means of a writ of foreign attachment issued in accordance with 10 Del.C. § 3506 and Superior Court Civil Rule 4(b), Del. C.Ann. The property attached consists of certain shares of stock of Trident Oil Corporation, a Delaware corporation, registered separately in the names of Thor H. Ramsing (Thor) and Martha W. Ramsing (Martha), two of the three nonresident individual defendants. The third defendant, Cynthia Ramsing (Cynthia) has not been served with process nor has her property been…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Litman v. Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Greyhound Corporation v. HeitnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- Crystallex Int'l Corp. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venez.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Grynberg v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.