Legal Opinion

Hansel v. Sherman Textiles

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8010IC207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendants raise assignments of error to the findings of fact by the full Commission. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the Commission’s findings are not supported by sufficient competent evidence to support the award and, therefore, vacate the award of the full Commission.

For purposes of our review, the pertinent facts as found by the deputy commissioner and adopted by the Commission follow:

“FINDINGS OF FACT

In 1967 plaintiff began working for defendant-employer as a weaver. Except for a six month’s absence in 1971, plaintiff worked continuously until May 5, 1977.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Russell v. Pharr Yarns, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Willis v. Reidsville Drapery PlantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Bass v. Morganite, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Blount v. Lance Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996
  4. Brady v. Kohl's Dept. StoreNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
  5. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API