Legal Opinion

Geigy Chemical Corp. v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 11, 1971No. 8441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtB.ich, Judge

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (abstract 158 USPQ 681) dismissing the opposition by appellant to the registration of the trademark HYDRO-NOL for “diuretic,” application serial No. 214,501, filed March 19, 1965, claiming first use June 10,1964. We reverse.

The application is to register HYDRONOL on the Principal Register, filed by Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and the specimen filed therewith shows that HYDRONOL, at the time of filing was a “new drug” marketed for investigational use only by a division of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Massey Junior College, Inc. v. Fashion Institute of TechnologyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Geigy Chemical Corporation v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. M'Otto Enterprises, Inc. v. Redsand, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1993
  5. Glenwood Laboratories, Inc. v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API