Legal Opinion
M'Otto Enterprises, Inc. v. Redsand, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 16, 1993No. C92-954GWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WILSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
I.JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This is a declaratory judgment action brought by M’Otto Enterprises, Inc. (“M’Otto”) against Redsand, Inc. (“Red-sand”), seeking a judgment that M’Otto’s “Red Eraser” caricature does not infringe Redsand’s marks or images. PreTrial Order (“PTO”) at ¶ 2.
2. Redsand counterclaimed against M’Otto for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Mushroom Makers, Incorporated v. R. G. Barry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Pegasus Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adidas-America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2007
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Skechers USA, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- New Balance Athletics, Inc. v. USA New Bunren International Co. Limited LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019